Congress demands extension of GST compensation, reset of economic policies

Spread the love

[ad_1]

Udaipur: The Congress party on Saturday demanded that the GST compensation period be extended by another three years amidst the current economic situation and poor financial health of states. The party also sought that current economic policies, 31 years after its government ushered in economic reforms, must be “reset” to take into account “global and domestic developments” as well as “social inequalities” and tweaked “for the next 10-20-30 years.” The Congress will also push the policy changes as a part of its 2024 manifesto.

Addressing the media at the Congress’ Chintan Shivir, former finance minister P Chidambaram demanded an extension of the compensation period and announced that the party would “strongly disapprove” any attempt of the government to prevent the GST Council from seeking such extension.

“The compensation period must be extended. It must be extended by at least another three years. We will strongly disapprove if any attempt is made by the Central Government or the Union Finance Minister to rail road the GST council and prevent it from recommending an extension of the GST compensation period by another three years,” he said.

The GST law allowed a five-year period for compensating states of any loss in tax revenues after the implementation of the Goods and Services Tax. The compensation window will end in June this year.

Thirty one years after he accompanied Dr. Manmohan Singh, then finance minister, in ushering liberalisation through economic reforms, P Chidambaram pitched for another “reset” in economic policies.

“We believe that we must prepare the Indian economy and the Indian workforce to adapt to the ways in which industry, business and trade will be conducted in the 21st century with the greater use of automation, robotics, machine learning and artificial intelligence. We believe that important changes in economic policies will be required in the light of climate change and the need for mitigation and adaptation,” the former finance minister explained.

Recalling his first experience in policy making in 1991, Chidambaram said, “We are now 30 years down the road. The world is changed, India is changed. A reset means- taking into account global and domestic development and fine-tuning the policies that have obviously given us benefits, but, clearly a time for reset has come. While we acknowledge that we have reaped enormous benefits as a result of liberalisation we take into account global and domestic developments and reset our policies for the next 10-20-30 years.”

He described the current state of economy as “a matter of extreme concern”, slammed the Reserve Bank of India for falling “behind the curve” in tackling inflation and said, “Inflation has risen to unacceptable level. The WPI is at 14.55% and the CPI is at 7.9%. There are high taxes on petrol and diesel and high GST tax rates. The job situation has never been so low with 40.38% job participation rate and unemployment rate at 7.83%.”

The Congress leader suggested the time is ripe for a comprehensive review of Centre-States fiscal relations. “The consequences of the poorly-drafted and unfairly-implemented GST laws brought in by the Modi government in 2017 are there for everyone to see. The States’ fiscal position is fragile as never before and needs urgent remedial measures,” Chidambaram said.

He rejected the government’s plea that high inflation rates are a result of the Russia-Ukraine war as “lame excuse” and argued that “high inflationary trend was noticed in pre-Ukraine war time. The Ukraine war has added to our problem.”

While unpaid GST compensation has remained a tricky issue between the states and the Centre, Chidambaram claimed there is a “complete break-down of trust” between the Central Government and the states including some BJP-ruled states.

[ad_2]

Source link

Tags:

6 thoughts on “Congress demands extension of GST compensation, reset of economic policies

  1. Unless a side bet has a vulnerability a casino failed to detect, side bets are gaming’s best friend. The rules of blackjack can’t undergo much change without alienating the market, so side bets are one way the house can make extra profit. That’s why the majority of side bets have a higher house edge than the game itself, which generates very little profit. At the Lucky Ladies side bet players are betting that their first two cards total 20, ideally with two queens. The top payoff is 1,000 to 1 if you get two queens of hearts and the dealer has a blackjack. If you get “only” two queens of hearts, it pays 200 to 1; a matched 20 (same rank and suit) pays 25 to 1; a suited 20 pays 10 to 1; and any unsuited 20 pays 4 to 1. The house edge is 17 percent; however, you can use the Hi-Lo count and get the edge on this side bet when the true count is 6.5 or higher (details in the report by KC Brooks in bjinsider, issue #147).
    https://www.corporatelivewire.com/profile.html?id=dfb1ec2ecab2a8b7a923eae43aee3755b183c2b1
    Many casinos offer a decent alternative for low rollers at video blackjack. Mirage is the exception to this rule. Video blackjack is an even bigger ripoff than the low limit live tables at Mirage. El Cortez has every right to do this under Nevada law. Casinos are permitted to restrict action from expert players at blackjack tables. This is not the case in Atlantic City, where Ken Uston prevailed in a lawsuit against Resorts International that forbids casinos there from banning skilled blackjack players. With some very rare exceptions, insurance is a sucker’s bet. The odds of winning are only 9:4, which means that you will win 4 times in 9 plays, but lose 5 times. When you win, it pays like a regular game win at 2-to-1 (you get double your bet back). However, a regular win without this side bet is about 46% (assuming you play perfect using all the blackjack rules), which is lower than 9:4 (44.4% change of winning). It just does not make sense. The casinos will often push this bet, since they make a nice profit from it. Just say no to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *